LogoHumanoid Robot ActuatorsOEM RFQ desk
Start inquiry
LogoHumanoid Robot Actuators
WhatsApp
LogoHumanoid Robot Actuators

Catalog-style humanoid robot actuator sourcing for prototypes, pilot builds, and OEM programs.

Inquiry Email

[email protected]

Subject: Product Selection Inquiry - Humanoid Robot Actuators

Email app

This inquiry starts from the catalog. Use the RFQ center to turn a broad shortlist into a candidate RFQ class, document request, and sample validation gate.

Instant Chat

+8618857971991

Chat on WhatsApp

Best for quick model-fit questions before a full RFQ email.

Products
  • Product Directory
  • Actuator Catalog
  • Leg Actuators
  • Arm & Wrist
  • QDD Actuators
  • Hollow-Shaft Joints
  • Controller Kits
  • Frameless Motors
  • Rotary Modules
  • Linear Actuators
  • Axial Flux & SMC
Solutions
  • Application Guide
  • Prototype Sourcing
  • Bipedal Leg Joints
  • Arm & Hand Actuators
  • Force-Control Selection
  • Robotics Lab Kits
OEM Capabilities
  • OEM Capability Hub
  • Model Selection
  • Fast Samples
  • Interface & Harness
  • BOM Integration
Resources
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact / RFQ
  • Procurement Guide
  • Actuator for Humanoid Robot
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 Humanoid Robot Actuators. All Rights Reserved.|Backed by Linkup Ai Co., Ltd. Manufacturing coordination, controlled documents, and quality records are handled through qualified project review.
← Back to Products

Highly Integrated Rotary Modules

Integrated rotary joint modules for humanoid hips, knees, ankles, shoulders, and elbows that combine motor, reducer, encoder, brake, driver, bearing support, and harness planning.

Target Buyer:For teams that want a working joint module faster than designing each actuator stack component separately.
Highly integrated rotary joint module for humanoid robot actuators

Reference visual for selection context. Confirm controlled drawings, CAD path, and test records for shortlisted models.

Engineering Asset Status

Reference visuals, controlled records on request

Current site images are reference selection visuals for catalog navigation. They should not be treated as final factory photos, CAD drawings, test records, or lot-specific inspection documents. For shortlisted models, request the controlled packet tied to model code, drawing revision, test condition, and sample lot.

Request model records

Public now

Reference visuals, product-family routes, RFQ class matrices, and validation checklists for early selection.

Request before PO

Controlled datasheet, drawing or CAD path, torque-speed or thermal record, wiring notes, and sample or OQC evidence.

Not claimed publicly

Verified factory-floor photos, teardown images, and lot-specific test reports are not presented as public evidence until real project assets exist.

Capability Highlights

  • Rotary actuator module selection by joint position and torque class
  • Harmonic, cycloidal, planetary, and QDD architecture comparison for humanoid joint duty
  • Integrated encoder, brake, driver, hollow-shaft, and output-bearing review before sample release

Typical Applications

  • Humanoid leg and arm joint modules
  • Bipedal locomotion test rigs
  • Multi-axis prototype actuator kits

Engineering Focus

  • Continuous torque, peak overload, output speed, backlash, output bearing capacity, and shock tolerance
  • Protocol, encoder architecture, brake behavior, driver current, and firmware compatibility
  • Mechanical envelope, output flange, cable exit, hollow-shaft routing, and joint shell fit

Key Evaluation Matrix

Continuous / peak torque split

Typical Range
<50, 50-150, and >150 Nm classes
Why It Matters
Humanoid teams need to avoid choosing from attractive peak torque numbers that cannot survive gait duty.

Backlash and stiffness

Typical Range
Reducer and bearing dependent
Why It Matters
Position repeatability, force control, and impact behavior are all affected by the integrated mechanical stack.

Protocol readiness

Typical Range
CAN, CAN FD, EtherCAT, RS485
Why It Matters
A joint module is not sample-ready if the driver and feedback loop cannot join the robot control network.
MetricTypical RangeWhy It Matters
Continuous / peak torque split<50, 50-150, and >150 Nm classesHumanoid teams need to avoid choosing from attractive peak torque numbers that cannot survive gait duty.
Backlash and stiffnessReducer and bearing dependentPosition repeatability, force control, and impact behavior are all affected by the integrated mechanical stack.
Protocol readinessCAN, CAN FD, EtherCAT, RS485A joint module is not sample-ready if the driver and feedback loop cannot join the robot control network.

Related RFQ Classes

Use these representative classes as shortlist anchors. Final quoted samples depend on confirmed drawings, torque-speed duty cycle, thermal assumptions, protocol, brake, encoder, and validation requirements.

HRA-C40-QDD

Compact QDD joint class

Torque Class
<50 Nm class
Form / Joint Fit

QDD rotary module

Wrist, neck, light ankle, compact lab axis

Output Window

2-4 Nm continuous

8-14 Nm peak

180-320 rpm output class

Interface Assumptions

OD 40-50 mm / short axial package

24-48 V DC

Absolute magnetic encoder

Sample Gate

Fast sample shortlist

Backdrivability, low-speed smoothness, current limit, and cable exit.

HRA-R55-ARM

Compact harmonic arm joint class

Torque Class
<50 Nm class
Form / Joint Fit

Integrated harmonic rotary module

Elbow, shoulder-light, wrist pitch/yaw

Output Window

6-15 Nm continuous

25-45 Nm peak

40-120 rpm output class

Interface Assumptions

OD 55-70 mm / hollow-shaft option

24-48 V DC

Absolute or dual encoder

Sample Gate

Model fit after envelope review

Backlash, cable-through routing, arm mass budget, and mirrored joint consistency.

HRA-R70-KNEE

Mid-load knee and ankle rotary class

Torque Class
50-150 Nm class
Form / Joint Fit

Integrated reducer rotary module

Knee-light, ankle pitch/roll, waist, shoulder-heavy

Output Window

18-45 Nm continuous

80-150 Nm peak

20-80 rpm output class

Interface Assumptions

OD 70-90 mm / reinforced output bearing

48-60 V DC

Dual encoder preferred

Sample Gate

Shortlist after robot mass and duty cycle

Thermal rise, overload duration, backlash, brake behavior, and shock load.

HRA-R95-HIP

Heavy hip actuator class

Torque Class
>150 Nm class
Form / Joint Fit

High-torque integrated rotary module

Hip pitch/roll/yaw, heavy knee, impact test rig

Output Window

60-120 Nm continuous

220-450 Nm peak

10-45 rpm output class

Interface Assumptions

OD 95-140 mm / high moment-load support

48-72 V DC

Dual encoder plus torque feedback option

Sample Gate

Engineering review before sample release

Continuous torque envelope, housing heat path, impact load, and bearing support.

HRA-HS80-CBL

Hollow-shaft cable-through joint class

Torque Class
50-150 Nm class
Form / Joint Fit

Hollow-shaft rotary module

Shoulder, elbow, waist, wrist cable-through axes

Output Window

20-55 Nm continuous

80-160 Nm peak

20-75 rpm output class

Interface Assumptions

OD 80-110 mm / bore confirmed by cable bundle

48-60 V DC

Absolute encoder with bore clearance review

Sample Gate

Cable bundle and flange review required

Bore size, cable fatigue, connector placement, backlash, and output bearing load.

ClassForm / Joint FitOutput WindowInterface AssumptionsSample Gate
HRA-C40-QDD
Compact QDD joint class
<50 Nm class
QDD rotary module
Wrist, neck, light ankle, compact lab axis
2-4 Nm continuous
8-14 Nm peak
180-320 rpm output class
OD 40-50 mm / short axial package
24-48 V DC
Absolute magnetic encoder
Fast sample shortlist: Backdrivability, low-speed smoothness, current limit, and cable exit.
HRA-R55-ARM
Compact harmonic arm joint class
<50 Nm class
Integrated harmonic rotary module
Elbow, shoulder-light, wrist pitch/yaw
6-15 Nm continuous
25-45 Nm peak
40-120 rpm output class
OD 55-70 mm / hollow-shaft option
24-48 V DC
Absolute or dual encoder
Model fit after envelope review: Backlash, cable-through routing, arm mass budget, and mirrored joint consistency.
HRA-R70-KNEE
Mid-load knee and ankle rotary class
50-150 Nm class
Integrated reducer rotary module
Knee-light, ankle pitch/roll, waist, shoulder-heavy
18-45 Nm continuous
80-150 Nm peak
20-80 rpm output class
OD 70-90 mm / reinforced output bearing
48-60 V DC
Dual encoder preferred
Shortlist after robot mass and duty cycle: Thermal rise, overload duration, backlash, brake behavior, and shock load.
HRA-R95-HIP
Heavy hip actuator class
>150 Nm class
High-torque integrated rotary module
Hip pitch/roll/yaw, heavy knee, impact test rig
60-120 Nm continuous
220-450 Nm peak
10-45 rpm output class
OD 95-140 mm / high moment-load support
48-72 V DC
Dual encoder plus torque feedback option
Engineering review before sample release: Continuous torque envelope, housing heat path, impact load, and bearing support.
HRA-HS80-CBL
Hollow-shaft cable-through joint class
50-150 Nm class
Hollow-shaft rotary module
Shoulder, elbow, waist, wrist cable-through axes
20-55 Nm continuous
80-160 Nm peak
20-75 rpm output class
OD 80-110 mm / bore confirmed by cable bundle
48-60 V DC
Absolute encoder with bore clearance review
Cable bundle and flange review required: Bore size, cable fatigue, connector placement, backlash, and output bearing load.

Evidence Before Sample PO

Product Evidence Path Before Ordering Samples

This product family should be evaluated with practical evidence before a first sample PO. The goal is to confirm fit, duty, control interface, validation target, and repeatability without pretending that every controlled drawing or test record is a public download.

Check pilot supply

Decisive Evidence for This Family

  • Integrated motor, reducer, encoder, brake, controller, housing, and connector boundary.
  • Protocol, firmware, current limit, heat path, and accessory compatibility for direct robot integration.
  • Change-control path for repeated modules across prototype and pilot builds.

Records to Request

  • Model summary with integrated component boundary and accessory list.
  • Protocol / wiring note, envelope drawing, and brake / encoder assumptions.
  • Revision baseline and outgoing inspection scope before pilot planning.

Sample PO Gate

Approve integrated rotary samples when the module boundary matches the buyer controller, mounting, and validation plan.

No-Go Signal

Pause if the buyer expects a turnkey joint but has not defined firmware, harness, mounting, or acceptance behavior.

01. Fit baseline

Buyer Input
Joint position, robot class, available OD / length / bore, mounting interface, cable exit, and first quantity.
Supplier Evidence
Candidate model family, envelope drawing, accessory boundary, and whether a standard model or OEM interface is required.
Hold Signal
At least one model path can be mapped to the mechanical envelope without inventing unconfirmed dimensions.
No-Go Signal
The inquiry only says "humanoid actuator" or "high torque motor" without joint, envelope, or quantity context.

02. Duty and thermal check

Buyer Input
Continuous output, peak output, peak duration, speed or stroke, cycle profile, current limit, and ambient assumption.
Supplier Evidence
Rated versus peak boundary, torque-speed or force-stroke explanation, temperature-rise note, and current-limit assumption.
Hold Signal
Selection is based on continuous duty and validation cycle, not peak output alone.
No-Go Signal
The sample decision depends on a peak rating while repeated gait, lift, grip, or force-control cycles are undefined.

03. Interface and control check

Buyer Input
Voltage bus, protocol, controller location, encoder, brake, pinout, cable length, and firmware integration boundary.
Supplier Evidence
Wiring / protocol note, controller compatibility, brake / encoder assumption, and connector or harness options.
Hold Signal
Electrical and control interfaces are clear enough for a bench test without late adapter redesign.
No-Go Signal
Mechanical fit is accepted but protocol, feedback, brake, or harness integration is still ambiguous.

04. Sample validation check

Buyer Input
The specific pass / fail test for the first sample: backlash, thermal rise, noise, force response, impact, or stroke repeatability.
Supplier Evidence
Focused inspection note, test record type, revision baseline, and which result should be checked by the buyer after receipt.
Hold Signal
Both sides know what evidence will decide whether the sample can move toward pilot planning.
No-Go Signal
The sample PO is placed without a named acceptance check or revision trace.

05. Pilot continuity check

Buyer Input
Pilot quantity, repeat-order forecast, inspection expectation, packaging / shipping limits, Incoterm, and destination.
Supplier Evidence
Repeat-lot change-control path, outgoing inspection scope, packaging baseline, and commercial delivery assumption.
Hold Signal
The accepted sample can be repeated without silent model, drawing, accessory, or firmware drift.
No-Go Signal
The project treats a one-off sample as proof of supply readiness without defining repeat-order controls.
GateBuyer InputSupplier EvidenceHold SignalNo-Go Signal
01. Fit baselineJoint position, robot class, available OD / length / bore, mounting interface, cable exit, and first quantity.Candidate model family, envelope drawing, accessory boundary, and whether a standard model or OEM interface is required.At least one model path can be mapped to the mechanical envelope without inventing unconfirmed dimensions.The inquiry only says "humanoid actuator" or "high torque motor" without joint, envelope, or quantity context.
02. Duty and thermal checkContinuous output, peak output, peak duration, speed or stroke, cycle profile, current limit, and ambient assumption.Rated versus peak boundary, torque-speed or force-stroke explanation, temperature-rise note, and current-limit assumption.Selection is based on continuous duty and validation cycle, not peak output alone.The sample decision depends on a peak rating while repeated gait, lift, grip, or force-control cycles are undefined.
03. Interface and control checkVoltage bus, protocol, controller location, encoder, brake, pinout, cable length, and firmware integration boundary.Wiring / protocol note, controller compatibility, brake / encoder assumption, and connector or harness options.Electrical and control interfaces are clear enough for a bench test without late adapter redesign.Mechanical fit is accepted but protocol, feedback, brake, or harness integration is still ambiguous.
04. Sample validation checkThe specific pass / fail test for the first sample: backlash, thermal rise, noise, force response, impact, or stroke repeatability.Focused inspection note, test record type, revision baseline, and which result should be checked by the buyer after receipt.Both sides know what evidence will decide whether the sample can move toward pilot planning.The sample PO is placed without a named acceptance check or revision trace.
05. Pilot continuity checkPilot quantity, repeat-order forecast, inspection expectation, packaging / shipping limits, Incoterm, and destination.Repeat-lot change-control path, outgoing inspection scope, packaging baseline, and commercial delivery assumption.The accepted sample can be repeated without silent model, drawing, accessory, or firmware drift.The project treats a one-off sample as proof of supply readiness without defining repeat-order controls.

Curves and Structure Evidence

What to Request Before Trusting the Sample Data

Public pages can introduce the actuator family, but final sample approval should be based on the records behind the rating. Use this checklist to ask for performance envelopes, duty assumptions, and section-view evidence without treating unverified marketing numbers as engineering proof.

Performance Curve Evidence

Torque-speed or force-speed envelope

Buyer Question
Does the actuator stay inside the usable output window at the target joint speed, not only at stall or no-load speed?
Input to Provide
Target continuous output, peak output, required speed or stroke rate, bus voltage, and controller current limit.
Supplier Record
Torque-speed, force-speed, or model summary with rated and short-duration peak boundaries stated separately.
Decision Signal
Move forward only when continuous output, peak duration, and speed are judged together for the sample duty.

Thermal rise and duty-cycle basis

Buyer Question
Will repeated gait, lift, grip, or force-control cycles push the motor, reducer, driver, or housing into thermal saturation?
Input to Provide
Cycle profile, ambient assumption, cooling path, enclosure condition, duty ratio, and allowable surface or winding temperature.
Supplier Record
Temperature-rise note, duty-cycle assumption, thermal path explanation, or sample test record tied to the selected class.
Decision Signal
Treat peak torque claims as incomplete until the repeated-duty thermal boundary is clear.

Overload duration and recovery limit

Buyer Question
How long can the module tolerate impact, squat recovery, step correction, or grasp overload before derating is required?
Input to Provide
Expected overload multiple, duration, frequency, robot mass or payload, and pass / fail recovery behavior.
Supplier Record
Peak duration note, overload inspection basis, brake behavior, bearing support comment, or derating boundary.
Decision Signal
Use this as a hold gate for hip, knee, ankle, and force-control samples where impact or overload is material.

Control response and feedback loop basis

Buyer Question
Can the motor, encoder, driver, brake, and protocol support the intended torque, position, or impedance-control behavior?
Input to Provide
Control mode, update rate expectation, protocol, encoder requirement, current limit, brake behavior, and bench-test setup.
Supplier Record
Controller compatibility note, encoder and brake assumption, wiring / protocol record, or matched kit recommendation.
Decision Signal
Do not separate mechanical sample approval from control-stack compatibility.
EvidenceBuyer QuestionInput to ProvideSupplier RecordDecision Signal
Torque-speed or force-speed envelopeDoes the actuator stay inside the usable output window at the target joint speed, not only at stall or no-load speed?Target continuous output, peak output, required speed or stroke rate, bus voltage, and controller current limit.Torque-speed, force-speed, or model summary with rated and short-duration peak boundaries stated separately.Move forward only when continuous output, peak duration, and speed are judged together for the sample duty.
Thermal rise and duty-cycle basisWill repeated gait, lift, grip, or force-control cycles push the motor, reducer, driver, or housing into thermal saturation?Cycle profile, ambient assumption, cooling path, enclosure condition, duty ratio, and allowable surface or winding temperature.Temperature-rise note, duty-cycle assumption, thermal path explanation, or sample test record tied to the selected class.Treat peak torque claims as incomplete until the repeated-duty thermal boundary is clear.
Overload duration and recovery limitHow long can the module tolerate impact, squat recovery, step correction, or grasp overload before derating is required?Expected overload multiple, duration, frequency, robot mass or payload, and pass / fail recovery behavior.Peak duration note, overload inspection basis, brake behavior, bearing support comment, or derating boundary.Use this as a hold gate for hip, knee, ankle, and force-control samples where impact or overload is material.
Control response and feedback loop basisCan the motor, encoder, driver, brake, and protocol support the intended torque, position, or impedance-control behavior?Control mode, update rate expectation, protocol, encoder requirement, current limit, brake behavior, and bench-test setup.Controller compatibility note, encoder and brake assumption, wiring / protocol record, or matched kit recommendation.Do not separate mechanical sample approval from control-stack compatibility.

Structure and Interface Evidence

Envelope drawing and CAD revision

Inspect For
OD, ID, axial length, flange, mounting bolt circle, output plane, cable exit, connector sweep, and assembly clearance.
Input to Provide
Robot joint envelope, CAD revision, mounting constraint, cable direction, and any forbidden volume.
Supplier Record
2D envelope, controlled CAD path, drawing revision note, and interface boundary for the candidate class.
Boundary
Public pages can show selection context; precise CAD should stay controlled until the model and project stage are clear.

Internal stack or section-view review

Inspect For
Motor, reducer, encoder, brake, bearing support, hollow routing, sealing surface, and structural heat path.
Input to Provide
Target joint, load path, shock expectation, harness route, brake need, and feedback architecture.
Supplier Record
Exploded-view reference, section-view note, component boundary, or engineering review comment for the selected sample path.
Boundary
Use this to identify integration risks without implying that every supplier drawing can be published openly.

Backlash, stiffness, and bearing support basis

Inspect For
Reducer type, output bearing support, moment-load path, backlash target, compliance behavior, and repeatability risk.
Input to Provide
Joint position, expected moment load, precision need, force-control target, and test that will decide sample acceptance.
Supplier Record
Backlash record, stiffness note, bearing support statement, or application-specific inspection scope.
Boundary
Especially important for leg modules, hollow-shaft modules, and compact arm joints where package size hides mechanical risk.

Harness, connector, and serviceability path

Inspect For
Cable bend radius, connector orientation, pinout, strain relief, service loop, and whether the joint can be assembled repeatedly.
Input to Provide
Cable bundle, connector preference, controller location, service access limit, and repeat-order accessory expectation.
Supplier Record
Wiring / protocol note, pinout baseline, harness option, accessory revision, or OEM interface recommendation.
Boundary
A sample that fits mechanically can still fail the project if harness and connector assumptions are late.
EvidenceInspect ForInput to ProvideSupplier RecordBoundary
Envelope drawing and CAD revisionOD, ID, axial length, flange, mounting bolt circle, output plane, cable exit, connector sweep, and assembly clearance.Robot joint envelope, CAD revision, mounting constraint, cable direction, and any forbidden volume.2D envelope, controlled CAD path, drawing revision note, and interface boundary for the candidate class.Public pages can show selection context; precise CAD should stay controlled until the model and project stage are clear.
Internal stack or section-view reviewMotor, reducer, encoder, brake, bearing support, hollow routing, sealing surface, and structural heat path.Target joint, load path, shock expectation, harness route, brake need, and feedback architecture.Exploded-view reference, section-view note, component boundary, or engineering review comment for the selected sample path.Use this to identify integration risks without implying that every supplier drawing can be published openly.
Backlash, stiffness, and bearing support basisReducer type, output bearing support, moment-load path, backlash target, compliance behavior, and repeatability risk.Joint position, expected moment load, precision need, force-control target, and test that will decide sample acceptance.Backlash record, stiffness note, bearing support statement, or application-specific inspection scope.Especially important for leg modules, hollow-shaft modules, and compact arm joints where package size hides mechanical risk.
Harness, connector, and serviceability pathCable bend radius, connector orientation, pinout, strain relief, service loop, and whether the joint can be assembled repeatedly.Cable bundle, connector preference, controller location, service access limit, and repeat-order accessory expectation.Wiring / protocol note, pinout baseline, harness option, accessory revision, or OEM interface recommendation.A sample that fits mechanically can still fail the project if harness and connector assumptions are late.

RFQ Checklist

  1. Joint map with hip, knee, ankle, shoulder, elbow, wrist, neck, or torso labels
  2. Continuous torque, peak torque, overload duration, speed, duty cycle, and robot mass
  3. Reducer preference, backlash target, brake requirement, protocol, and bus voltage
  4. Envelope drawing, flange interface, cable exit, sample quantity, and delivery schedule

Risk Controls

  • Module looks strong on paper but cannot fit the joint shell: Confirm OD, axial length, flange, cable exit, connector, hollow shaft, and external bearing assumptions before PO.
  • The buyer compares modules without defining validation duty: Lock acceptance tests for walking cycles, bench load, temperature rise, backlash, and emergency brake behavior.

Document Request Path for This Product Family

Treat this page as the selection context for datasheets, drawings, CAD access, wiring notes, and sample records. Controlled files should be requested with a candidate model, integration stage, and revision baseline.

Public selection packet

Best Timing
Early shortlist
Documents
Datasheet, model summary, basic envelope image, and application fit notes.
Input to Include
Target joint, output window, voltage / protocol assumption, and quantity direction.
Boundary
Used for selection only; it is not a controlled drawing or final project guarantee.

RFQ-qualified engineering packet

Best Timing
Before sample quote
Documents
2D envelope, interface notes, wiring / protocol note, accessory list, and sample gate.
Input to Include
Drawing revision, mechanical envelope, controller stack, and validation priority.
Boundary
Provided after the model path is clear; it may still exclude editable CAD or supplier-controlled internals.

NDA-controlled CAD packet

Best Timing
Before mechanical freeze
Documents
STEP / CAD path, pinout details, revision-controlled drawings, and customization notes.
Input to Include
Confirmed candidate model, buyer entity, project scope, and NDA path if needed.
Boundary
Not an automatic website download; controlled files depend on model, OEM scope, and permission.

Sample validation packet

Best Timing
Before pilot decision
Documents
Inspection note, focused test result, revision record, and packing / shipment baseline.
Input to Include
Accepted sample scope, test fixture context, pass / fail priority, and pilot quantity.
Boundary
Generic records may not answer the application risk; request the exact test that matters.
PacketBest TimingDocumentsInput to IncludeBoundary
Public selection packetEarly shortlistDatasheet, model summary, basic envelope image, and application fit notes.Target joint, output window, voltage / protocol assumption, and quantity direction.Used for selection only; it is not a controlled drawing or final project guarantee.
RFQ-qualified engineering packetBefore sample quote2D envelope, interface notes, wiring / protocol note, accessory list, and sample gate.Drawing revision, mechanical envelope, controller stack, and validation priority.Provided after the model path is clear; it may still exclude editable CAD or supplier-controlled internals.
NDA-controlled CAD packetBefore mechanical freezeSTEP / CAD path, pinout details, revision-controlled drawings, and customization notes.Confirmed candidate model, buyer entity, project scope, and NDA path if needed.Not an automatic website download; controlled files depend on model, OEM scope, and permission.
Sample validation packetBefore pilot decisionInspection note, focused test result, revision record, and packing / shipment baseline.Accepted sample scope, test fixture context, pass / fail priority, and pilot quantity.Generic records may not answer the application risk; request the exact test that matters.
Request matching documents

Product Gallery

Integrated humanoid robot actuator module with compact housing
Reference visual: Integrated humanoid robot actuator module with compact housing
Dual encoder robotic joint module for integrated actuator selection
Reference visual: Dual encoder robotic joint module for integrated actuator selection

Buyer FAQ

Can one RFQ cover several rotary module sizes?

Yes. Send a joint map and we can shortlist wrist, elbow, knee, ankle, and hip classes together so the actuator stack stays coherent.

Procurement guide

Read Before Finalizing the Product Shortlist

Use the procurement guide when this product family is entering comparison, RFQ, or sample review. It translates page-level claims into torque-speed, interface, evidence, and supplier-readiness questions.

Open guide
Sourcing Humanoid Robot Actuators in 2026

A buyer-side guide for pre-modular humanoid actuator sourcing: selection risk, evidence requests, sample readiness, and pilot supply controls.

Use it to check
  • Torque-speed, force-stroke, or actuator-envelope assumptions
  • Datasheet, CAD, wiring, and validation-record request scope
  • Sample PO hold signals before controlled files are released

Next sourcing step

01 Catalog shortlist

Then validate the application fit

After a product family is shortlisted, validate the joint load case, sample gate, and evidence boundary before custom files or pilot timing enter the discussion.

Open validation planSend catalog RFQ

Related Resources

  • High-Torque Leg Actuator Modules
  • Standard Actuator Model Selection
  • Contact / RFQ

Inquiry Email

[email protected]

Subject: RFQ Inquiry - Highly Integrated Rotary Modules

Email app

This inquiry started from a product family page. Keep the request anchored to model-family fit, interface assumptions, and sample evidence. Source context: Highly Integrated Rotary Modules.

Instant Chat

+8618857971991

Chat on WhatsApp

Best for quick model-fit questions before a full RFQ email.